Argue to Agree

Argue to Agree2

Arguments cannot be avoided in relationships.  Usually, we handle them badly.  Consider an argument, any type of argument between you and your partner resulting in the country having to go to war.

Would we have to go to war because you could not yield; or are being stubborn?   Would we have to go to war because it had to be done your way, or perhaps you go on emotional tangents, thus blocking your ability to see a different perspective?

Probably not.  You would consider your position for the greater good.  You would consider the pros and cons for both sides and make the best decisional response in your argument.

The same concept should apply to your relationship.  Your argument should be constructive, and logical.  Not based on emotional feelings alone.  Arguments call for both partners to be objective.

If the argument with your partner resulted in saving lives, you would most likely be bartering, compromising, rethinking your position or looking at your partner’s position objectively.   There are lives weighing in on your argumentative position.

Your relationship after ending the argument is extremely important. It will not have to create world peace, but peace is crucial to your togetherness and harmony as a couple.

Arguing to agree, should be the shared foundational understanding.  Meaning, that both of you will provide different vantage points on both the approach and expression of your argument.

According to Queendom, The Land of Tests, in the article called, Arguing and Relationships, it makes a valid point of, “A healthy relationship has room for an open confrontation and constructive criticism. If the couple fights constructively, the arguing becomes less frequent, and communication becomes more effective. The relationship becomes a ground for personal growth. The partners get past their defensiveness and start to work out their inner conflicts, to heal old wounds, get over their insecurities; simply put, they evolve as individuals and as a couple.”  http://www.queendom.com/articles/articles.htm?a=8

During the course of an argument, responding defensively causes an offensive response from your partner. Both responses remove the focus from the subject of discussion. It puts both partners in the position of having to emotionally self-protect.  Once this happens, the argument becomes bigger than it needs to be.

The object of the argument should answer the questions: “Why are we having this particular discussion?  How is it productive to the relationship?  How is it progressive?” If the argument does not move your relationship forward; nor benefits you individually or jointly, then drop it.  It is useless.

I was having a discussion with someone involving a DVD I had seen, regarding Michael Jackson and Dick Gregory.  I thought the information was quite informative and was sharing it.  The person I was talking to said, “Well, Dick Gregory would not help Michael Jackson when he asked for help with his diet. Dick wasn’t so willing to help Michael out.  So, Dick Gregory is just talking out of both sides of his mouth.”

My response was, “Unless we were there, we cannot speak on here say.”   This person got pretty pissed and basically thought I was defending Dick Gregory, when all I was trying to explain was that neither he nor I could validate such information.  Becoming further upset, he said, “Well, do not allow me to take your Dick Gregory away!”   (huh?)

When I saw this person becoming emotionally upset, to the point, he needed to curse to defend his position; I asked him, “Why are we taking the discussion to this level when Michael Jackson is dead?  This discussion is a moot point.”

I simply ended the conversation by saying, “This makes no sense to me.  I am not going to argue with you about someone who is dead.  I have work to do that I have to get back to.  I am going to say goodbye and hang up.”  This made more sense to me, rather than going on and getting more involved about something that had nothing to do with us.  We hung up.

I waited 20 minutes, and called him back saying, “I hope we are good.  I am not getting into an argument with you about something that has nothing to do with us, and we cannot confirm such statements.  Being highly emotional about it solves nothing.” His response was, “Yea. You are right.”

When it comes to your feelings, try to be as objective as possible.  If your feelings cannot be validated by something concrete or if they cannot be supported by an absolute, a statistic, or experience, do not create an argument on an emotional tangent.  Proceeding down this path, will be more destructive to your relationship, than productive.

Posted in Settling | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Relationships: The Statistics of Our Decisions to Settle

Settling2

According to the shocking statistics we read, it is quite evident we are not making the best Love decisions for our lives.  Keep in mind that statistics are usually relative, at the time of research, and based on certain demographics. Even with this in mind, it is logical to conclude (generally) we are settling for a desperate emotional need, but that same need is the cause of our permanent dissatisfaction in the long run.

Why are we settling?  Have we lost the Love of our life?  Or have we yet to find him/her? Either way there are much better options than settling.

According to 32 Shocking Divorce Statistics:  The article, “Why Men Are Settling for Mrs. Good Enough

31 percent of adult men said they’d commit to a person they were not in love with—as long as she had all the other attributes they were looking for in a mate.

21 percent said they’d commit under those same circumstances to somebody they weren’t sexually attracted to.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/02/21/why-men-are-settling-for-mrs-good-enough.html

Some of the major problems men are having in relationships are sexual deprivation and dissatisfaction.  Settling with someone you are not attracted to, leaves no other result, but a sexless relationship.  We are settling to our dissatisfaction.

Askmen (Become a Better Man) had some interesting research results. http://www.askmen.com/dating/heidi_100/138_dating_girl.html 

40% of women said they could deal with a lazy man (someone who doesn’t help with the chores or who watches too much TV)

60% of women said they could overlook a man’s weight

40% of women said they could ignore bad habits (like public belching, farting and nose picking)

There is nothing livable or acceptable about a lazy man.  If watching too much television is his priority, he sure in hell is not paying attention to much else.  This results in neglect, lack of communication, a limited and unproductive sex life, minimal emotional intimacy and lack of relational focus.

Many women are more attracted to men who are toned or in good shape.  Settling for a guy who is not physically pleasing or attractive is very difficult to sex in bed, or even to be intimate with.  These women are tempted to cheat.  Isn’t the purpose of being with someone is to remove the need to look, seek, and be elsewhere? 

Nothing is cute about being uncouth. Public bad habits are a real problem. 

We not only settle in the relationship, but we make marriage the next step!  With a 50% chance of failure, and we choosing to settle, there is no wonder that a divorce is happening every 13 seconds. That’s 6,646 divorces per day, and 46,523 divorce per week. http://www.mckinleyirvin.com/blog/divorce/32-shocking-divorce-statistics/

41 percent of first marriages end in divorce
60 percent of second marriages end in divorce.
73 percent of third marriages end in divorce

We can logically conclude we are failing to learn the lessons, because the statistics get higher at every marriage chance we take. What is great about these statistics is we are definitely not settling to stay for “continued” dissatisfaction.

Although, some of us stay in a damaged relationship, anyway.  The number one reason for staying in a damaged relationship is:  “I’d rather settle for him than be alone.”

Miser, Dani “Top 10 excuses folk use to stay in a relationship” Christian Dating Advice,
http://www.cbn.com/family/datingsingles/top-10-excuses-stay-bad-relationship-miser.aspx

Unless you live in Sweden where 47% of the population lives alone; and the US coming in at only 28% of the population that lives alone— this is a very small number to generate a fear factor.  Staying in this relationship is someone who is really desperate or fearful.  If the answer is fear are we not facing our own reality?

Internet dating Statistics: 40 Million Americans use online dating services, but at the same time 48% of breakups in online relationships happen by email.  Statistic Brain, http://www.statisticbrain.com/dating-relationship-stats/

Well, the dear John letters are now extinct!  We can now break up with you electronically. 

If you have met the person you truly Love, then you need to go for it.  Settling should never be an option or consideration!

If you’ve met the Love of your life and have somehow done some really stupid stuff, it does not matter.  Apologize profusely.  Do it!  What do you have to lose?  Your pride?  Get over it.  The alternative is becoming a statistic by settling for just anybody. 

If you are waiting, (because Love comes around at least once in our life) use other alternatives of the in between time and have fun with it!  Just do not lock down to it or marry to it.  Make those alternatives very appealing while satisfying your emotional and logical needs.  Therefore, you won’t be emotionally driven to settle.

If 71% of people believe in love at first sight:  http://www.statisticbrain.com/online-dating-statistics/  Can’t we believe in the Love within our very reach?

Posted in Settling | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment